Hearing Aid

18 08 2009

A quick post to announce that I’ve been appointed as the SRA’s first Hearing Aid co-ordinator.

For those of you who don’t know, Hearing Aid is a series of charity events held across the UK.  There’s more on the 2008 event at the official website.

Hearing Aid was created by Livewire1350.  In the winter of 2006 the station decided to expand the event nationally for spring 2007.  It was officially supported by the SRA in 2008 and became an internal part of the SRA in April 2009.

Until earlier this year, Hearing Aid was co-ordinated by Dave Bradshaw, formerly of Livewire 1350 until he stood down from the position in February.  I’m pleased to be taking on the position and am looking forward to working with SRA member stations on raising as much money as possible for a good cause.





Fun Radio France… and an idea

16 08 2009

I’ve just come back from a week in France… where I took the opportunity to take advantage of my in-car radio.

I spent most of my time listening to Fun Radio – which is pretty much the same as Galaxy in the UK (being very dance/house music orientated with a smattering of urban music, though no R&B).  Based on the advertising I could understand, I assume it’s targeting the male B/C1/C2/D demographic (my French is pretty abysmal but an advert for “Le premier chat sexy” using a female voice  and giving out an SMS number is the giveaway…)

The one interesting thing I spotted though was the incredibly high rotation of the music – certain songs were being played every 2 hours or so, which continued into the late night schedule. It seems that the 9 hour “Party Fun” show from 9pm-6am is simply the same music as in the daytime schedule but with the tracks being mixed together (and not necessarily done nicely).

What’s really thrown me is that I’m talking about a very big national commercial station – which makes it a station playing the same music in a higher rotation than Galaxy but with national FM coverage.

So the idea… and something that Student radio can use to it’s advantage.

The one great benefit of the tracks being in such a high rotation was that it was fairly easy to work out which songs I liked and which I didn’t, as I knew that if I missed something it would be back on relatively quickly. It also meant there was no need to resort to a service like Shazzam or a visit to the station’s website.

It’s something I believe student radio should consider trying out – naturally, it won’t work for every station and I wouldn’t suggest trying such an idea during daytime – it’s better suited to overnights, particularly as the majority of student stations can’t access their studios overnight.

Fun Radio certainly takes this idea to the extreme but I can see some very good ways of making this work – local/unsigned music would benefit massively for such exposure, as would the more niche music genres of music.

I should say that the Fun Radio version is very polished – the music might be in a 2 hour rotation but, if it is voice-tracked, it doesn’t sound like it is. That’s a problem for student stations as you’d probably have to voice-track or pre-record the show but I don’t think it would impact too heavily in a negative way – and the extra exposure for the music you showcase is undoubtedly going to improve the profile of your station.

As an aside, it seems that France is not going with DAB – it’s using DMB instead. I suggest having a read of Grant Goddard’s Radio Blog, which was used as the weekly viewpoint in the Radio Today weekly email roundup sent last Monday. Grant talks about Germany deciding not to use more public funds for DAB and the impact it will have across Europe.

My own thoughts are more basic – it’s clear that even in Europe, different contries are using different standards and it’s a disappointment that we have such a variety of standards in the world – HD Radio (Hybrid Digital, not High Definition, as use in North America), DAB (and DAB +), DMB, DRM… just for starters. While FM can be bettered, it would be nice if we had one standard (FM is used pretty much globally, with Japan using slightly lower 76-90MHz range) rather than the multitude of competing standards… saying that, it’s pretty unlikely that’ll happen any time soon.

One final point – Radio 4 Long Wave is more than listenable to in northern France… during the day at least (thanks to signal and atmospheric conditions).  But it’s surprising to me that the old analogue standards (LW/MW) are still going strong (at least until the targes in Digital Britain are met). Saying that, the TV transition to the current 625 line analogue  standard lasted 21 years from the launch of BBC Two in 1964 until 1985.  The current analogue 625 line standard will co-exist with DVB-T Digital in the UK for 10 years until the TV switchover to digital is completed in 2012.  It makes me wonder just how long it will take for radio to go to one broadcast platform in the UK…





Winding down…

1 06 2009

As some of you may be aware, I’m standing down from my position as Development Officer of the Student Radio Association.

As of today, we’re entering the handover month: effectively I’ll be job sharing with my successor, Sejal Kansara, for the month. I’ll leave the post at the end of June.

It’s been a hugely productive year for the SRA: starting with a major rebrand and new website (which is now constantly being improved) to arguably the best awards night in the event’s 13 year history and the biggest student radio conference ever held.

For me, it brings to a close nearly 6 years of student radio and close to a quarter of my life working towards improving student radio in Birmingham and nationally… starting with a last minute (and drunken) decision to present a Sunday afternoon show on October 26th 2003, to the antics of Southampton, York and ending with the exhausting long weekend that was the Leeds conference.

I’d like to take the opportunity to wish the next executive the best of success for the coming year.

As for this blog, I’ll keep it open and updated as best as I can, though the focus and content will move away from my own work to my thoughts on how industry movements will affect student radio.

Cheers,
Ian





Student Radio Conference 2009

12 04 2009

A quick post about the conference in Leeds.

It’s been a mental week: starting on Friday with loads of non-radio based travelling to Cardiff, Bristol and finally Swansea…

…leading to the CMA conference in Leicester on Saturday: which provided some useful infomation, particularly with regards to grant funding which I’m sure will be of use to student radio.

Sunday was a massive trip up north to Leeds for the SRA conference… there’s far FAR too much that happened to explain in full here but it was arguably the best ever (so says our previous Secretary)!

Having said that, I wasn’t re-elected to my position of Development Officer: the only low-light of the last week. Therefore I’ll be leaving my position by the summer.

I’ll keep this blog open as there’s still plenty to talk about, so keep checking back for more info on the industry and how student radio can go forward and improve.

Also, thanks to Mark, Matt, Tim, Sarah and Kate for the last year: it’s been an immense privilege working with all of you, and a year I won’t forget.

Ian





Busy busy week….

22 03 2009

It’s been a very busy week….

It’s all go with the Student Radio Conference just two weeks away but we still had the opportunity to have a meeting in Reading earlier today regarding the constitution… I can’t go into the specifics yet but five hours at the Upin Arms in Reading was enough to go through the entire document… there’ll be more on this at the conference in two weeks time.

This following two meetings on Wednesday, one being the quarterly RIDG meeting, the other being with PPL… I’ll post a full update on those in the next few days.






BurnFM.com in the papers

24 01 2009

The station that kicked off my radio career, BurnFM.com, was in the papers last month thanks to a story about two presenters and a claim they made about Kristina O’Connor (Des O’Connor’s daughter, also a final year student at Birmingham University).

I can’t really make much comment about this for the time being, other than to say the comments in question were made in reference to this article printed in the student newspaper at Birmingham University, Redbrick (note that the article is incomplete and missing the relevant images referred to by the media). In addition, contrary to some reports, It was only broadcast online and in October, not December as reported.

What I can do is provide the links: The original story, published in print on p11 of the Thursday edition of the Daily Mail on December 18th is available here.

There was a follow-up article published on the 22nd, which you can find here.

It was also reported online by:

The Telegraph.

The Sun.

The Metro.

The Birmingham Post.

The Birmingham Mail.

The Sunday Mercury.

The Daily Sport also ran the story as the frontpage of their 19th December issue, along with a fuller panel on page 15 (which is not available online).

If you’ve got any comments about what happened, please leave them below.





Student Radio Awards 2008 Feedback…

7 12 2008

…is being sent out.  It’s being sent out automatically, so please allow a few days to receive it as the mailserver may take its time to send out the several hundred emails of feedback.

Any queries get in touch with Mark (though please wait until Thursday): I’ll also forward on any enquiries.





Student Radio Awards/SBES 2008 & more

9 11 2008

Now that I’ve fully recovered from a 50+ hour week of SRA work and events, it’s time to write about it!

As you’ll know from previous posts, while the other exec members have been focusing on the awards night held on Thursday, I dealt with organising the SBES 2008 SRA stand.

Having had to blast up the M5 to Birmingham to make the 5:30 registration deadline (arriving at a timely 5:29) I had the chance to find our stand and register properly.  From there to Staples, to print out some posters (which weren’t cheap, but a reasonable price and on good quality paper).  A quick pizza and frantic mobile top-up (I’m still using PAYG!) I headed to Oxford for the night.

The Wednesday on the exhibition floor of the NEC Pavilion was very interesting: I’ll be interested to see the visitor numbers compared to last year, as it certainly felt quieter than 2007.  However we still had the opportunity to promote student radio and the new I Love Student Radio campaign: more on that soon.

So to Thursday… and to the Student Radio Awards 2008.

As I’ve said before my involvement was minimal at best, predominantly focused on digitising the nominated entries to ease the judging process… I can now add filling the Global Radio attendee bags and going to the Global Radio tour of their Leicester Square studios (they’re doing some very impressive work there).

Onto the night itself… very impressed with the work Kate and Tim have done over the last few months and all credit to them for pulling off one of, if not THE best Student Radio Awards in its 13 year history.  Mark’s speech to the VIPs seemed to go down well… as did the appearance of Jason Donovan thanks to Global Radio!

I can’t remember everyone I spoke to during the afterparty, though I’m particular pleased by the enthusiasm shown by both Nick Wallis (former SRA Chair) and Huw Stevens (the Awards Chair and Radio 1 presenter) towards the awards night and my plans for the next few months.  I’m also pleased to have spoken to several students at the night: though my apologies if I missed you.

So following a 60+ hour week (working for dad on Monday driving around Gloucestershire, SBES and the awards… Newport-Birmingham-Oxford-Birmingham-Oxford-Reading & a 30min walk to the station-London-Reading-Birmingham-Newport over 6 days), I’m now back at working on some possible motions for our General Meeting next month and some alterations to our membership forms: all memberships expire on 31st December, so there’s some work to be done on sorting them out.

And I’m now in a position to work further on the factsheets, Survival Guide and a new project I’ll be launching at our next General Meeting.  A few weeks back I had the opportunity to read every file I acquired from the previous Development Officer and Secretary.  There’s eight years of ideas to consider and I’ve already listed the best of those… I’ll be working on those but I’m after more… I’ll explain how that’ll work once I’ve announced my plans and fully discussed them with the exec.





Awards Entry digitising, SBES, Nominations Parties, a few online comments… and the conference

24 10 2008

It’s been a busy 2 weeks since my last post so it’s time to fill you in.

To cut a long story short the majority of my SRA time has been needed to digitise the nominated entries for the Student Radio Awards 2008: as of Monday that’s completed, so I can focus on my main work for the next 2 weeks… and will allow the final judging rounds to take place.

While the exec are in the final throws of organising the Student Radio Awards 2008, my input (other than the entry digitising) has been fairly minimal: simply as my responsibilities don’t directly cover the organising of the awards night (essentially I spend time on the awards as and when it’s needed… so mainly the digitising of entries described above; the awards sorting and the redux)) .  However, it’s not the only event we’ll have a presence at on November 6th…

…as we’ll be exhibiting everything Student Radio at SBES 2008, held at the NEC in Birmingham.  Currently I’m organising our stand for the 2 days (5/6th November) so that’s my primary focus for the next fortnight.  It’s free to attend though you do need to register in advance here. It’s the ideal event to find out more about radio, especially if you like your equipment.

Talking of fortnights, a fortnight ago we had the Nominations Parties across the UK in Stirling, Leeds, Salford, Leicester, Bath and London.  I’m fairly pleased with the outcome of the day, particularly the training sessions in Salford and the announcements in Leeds.  There are areas we need to work on for next year but knowing what they are should make a big difference… especially as I’ve got plenty of feedback from some of the regions.

I’ve also got plenty of recommendations for the exec, which I’ll be discussing with them in due course.

Now onto comments about the nominations… and we’ve had plenty of them!

The nominations announcements always bring out some interesting comments from the community; in particular because some people are annoyed/disappointed/aggrieved at not being nominated. 

This year has seen some interesting emails/blog posts/forum posts based on the size of stations, levels of funding and the possibility of creating new awards based on the size of a station (like the Sony Radio Awards), along with the suggestion that we under-represent “small” stations.

The problem is how to define a small station.  I’ve read many ideas from the community about this but no one specific definition: and it’s difficult to define station size, for the simple reason that the community is too diverse to accurately do so.  Financial support? Turnover? Membership size? Number of Listeners? Age? University population? Number of awards won? Those that have radio courses?

Having considered this over the last 2 weeks, I’m inclined to think that comparing any 2 of the above would produce a significantly different definition of a “small” station… and listener numbers are subject to interpretation, especially for stations with FM/AM licenses as it’s nearly impossible to measure numbers (RAJAR can’t be used as you have to register a permanent address… something students don’t usually have when at university).

I feel though that I have to address some of the comments I’ve read in the last 2 weeks:

  • Judging is simply based on the quality of the content submitted and any bias that a judge might have favouring their former station simply can’t happen: there are at least 2 judges for each round (the number of rounds varies on the category) and they have to agree on which are the better entries.
  • Judges come across all parts of the industry, from BBC to Global to independents.  Many are student radio alumni and judge simply because they respect and love the community.  So the chances of one organisation favouring certain aspects of an entry will be minimal.
  • The judges are usually able to eliminate a significant number of entries very quickly for the simple reason that the quality of the content isn’t good enough and they decide using the same guidelines that entrants have prior to entering.
  • The SRA exec have absolutely no involvement with the judging of the awards, other than to sort them into categories for distribution to the judges and to process payments: the process is completely independent of the exec and we therefore have no influence over the results.
  • Different stations approach the awards differently: there is very little the SRA itself can do to change this.
  • The same applies for funding: we can’t realistically insist that entrants have to pay from their own pocket to entry, especially as cheating could be easily achieved without our knowledge.
  • However there is always going to be some interpretation about what good/bad radio is and there always will be. But it’s the best people who judge, people at the very top of their game: which is as fair as we can get.
  • And finally: there’s little correlation to the number of entries a station submits and the number of nominations gained.  Obviously a station that submits 3 entries won’t get 10 nominations.  Other stations have and will submit 40+ entries in a single year: some with one or 2 good enough to be nominated, some with more than 10.  The difference is simply down to the main reason good radio succeeds: Content Is King.

Our members are always welcome to contact us with ANY queries they have. I can’t highlight the importance of this enough: we’re always happy to help with any request for information but it’s discouraging when very few are received.  My job is predominately about helping members and improving the association: I can’t do that if people don’t directly contact me with their comments, opinions or suggestions.

I’ve also read that some of the information we have on our members is incorrect.  We’re well aware of that but for accurate information we need member stations to regularly update the details… something that definitely doesn’t happen with the majority, even when we ask.

If you want to update your details, either request your log-on for our members database to edit it, or provide us with the details we need to make them accurate. 

And why do we have the information? So we know how our members operate and to act in the best interests of as many as possible: which applies to all aspects of our work.  Not having access to that data makes it far more difficult to do our work.

Finally, the exec have chosen the host of the 2009 Student Radio Conference, which we’ll be announcing very soon. I can’t say much more about if now… that’s for next time.